A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning potential neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal website in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to develop their relatives household. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven citizens. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being built by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have Long lasting ecological implications, specially inside a sensitive coastal ecosystem including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly built, is in the correct placement. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of the sea are equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable efforts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-superior water in the course of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times, a picture which includes considering that come to be emblematic in the depth with the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were meant to Get Visible evidence from the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Times documented, describing how The 2 men entered the water during critical climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became Probably the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall prolonged into a place influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being included in detail via the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 turned commonly searched phrases as readers sought to be aware of the track record and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read additional submissions on regardless of whether interim orders need to be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key second from the lawful timeline.
In the core in the dispute can be a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain the wall, as made, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his assessment of organizing paperwork, maps, and disorders attached into the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their action is determined by issue for environmental protection and adherence to organizing law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public see, insisting as a substitute that it is about making sure that progress at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've got explained their extensive-standing link to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just looking to produce a family members residence in accordance Together with the legislation. They deny that the wall encroaches with a Distinctive Space of Conservation and say that each one performs happen to be performed based upon Skilled guidance and permitted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as moving into The ocean during a storm, tend not to change the underlying facts.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute over building of wall at coastal web page is now a shorthand description for a condition that a lot of observers see as significantly frequent. As sea concentrations rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation concerning private land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting equally the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal solution.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome continues to be unsure. The courtroom ought to identify whether or not the wall as designed complies with setting up authorization and no matter if any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling ailments. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other extensive following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development operates at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation prolong beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when Paul Feely and Rene Collier fundamental troubles such as environmental defense and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it is going to finally be altered, removed, or accomplished as prepared will rely on the court docket’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.